https://archive.is/2nQSh

It marks the first long-term, stable operation of the technology, putting China at the forefront of a global race to harness thorium – considered a safer and more abundant alternative to uranium – for nuclear power.

The experimental reactor, located in the Gobi Desert in China’s west, uses molten salt as the fuel carrier and coolant, and thorium – a radioactive element abundant in the Earth’s crust – as the fuel source. The reactor is reportedly designed to sustainably generate 2 megawatts of thermal power.

  • @xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    According to GPT-4.1:

    In 1959, Norway achieved a notable milestone by starting up its first nuclear reactor, the JEEP I (Joint Establishment Experimental Pile), located at Kjeller. This reactor was primarily used for research purposes, including early experiments with alternative nuclear fuels such as thorium. While JEEP I itself was not a thorium reactor per se, it laid the groundwork for subsequent Norwegian research into thorium as a nuclear fuel. This early phase demonstrated Norway’s scientific interest in thorium, leveraging its domestic thorium resources and contributing to later thorium reactor experiments.

      • @Frostbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 days ago

        Norway has one of the worlds largest deposits of thorium, but I have ot heard that we had a working reactor, just the principle of one.

        If the chinese has indeed made it work I think we need to prepare for USA wanting to annex Norway as well

      • @xia@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I hope it’s not “worse than useless” (which would mean “misleading”), as my goal was simply to find more identifiers for discussion or research beyond those provided: norway, thorium, 1959…

        • @sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’m sorry to come on so strong – I don’t think it’s worse than useless as a tool to approach the right answers – but as I saw people upvoting this ‘answer’ without doing any checking, it occurs to me that this is how misinformation spreads. I hope my comment makes more sense in that context.